A prologue in a novel is backstory, and you can drop it in anywhere you want.
Did you know there are reasons why few how-to-write books mention prologues, why editors don't like them, and why readers skip over them?
I'll bet when you look at a book for the first time, and it has a prologue, you flip over the prologue to get to the good stuff of the first word of the first line of the first chapter. Like you, readers want to meet an interesting character in an interesting situation.
And basically, prologues are ineffective because:
A) the information in that prologue initially came to the writer as a message in disguise from the writer's imagination. That message was meant strictly for the writer to get the story underway. Often such information is about the story world, back history of a character, an important legend or curse, etc.
B) again, the reader (and many editors) skip over a prologue to get to the good stuff which is Chapter 1, the beginning of the story and the introduction of the problem and the protagonist.
C) the information in a prologue often misleads the reader as to who the important characters are or what the actual theme or conflict of the story is.
D) having a prologue means extra work to create two effective hook openings, one for the prologue and one for the first chapter.
This will sound harsh, but—
Sorry.
No.
What's needed are better writing and storytelling skills coupled with good craft techniques and devices so the prologue information can be incorporated, that is, woven into the story.
After all, isn't the writer's goal to keep a reader enthralled and reading on?
# # #